this reads like an LLM generated argument. it's totally incoherent and has almost nothing to do with what's being discussed.
cheers, friend.
cheers, friend.
<< reply is weirdly bombastic and generally incoherent.
Bombast should not prevent you from being able to form an argument.
Incoherence would, but then it would make sense to point out something specific hang on. Otherwise, we are just putting random words together... you know.. like llm?
i'm over our little interaction. cheers.