Hacker News Reader

I'd rather hear: "The compiled code has gone through all tests in the comprehensive, human-expert-written, standardized test suite correctly"

Compiling does not differentiate between True and False, so no safety for that escape pod door.

I took that as part of the build process.

But I definitely want as much as possible to be automated and formally correct, which is why I wrote what I wrote.

There's a lot of code that compiles but isn't correct.

Because we're using languages with flexibility but no correctness, but the vast performance advantage AI programming has over us could be used to manage the formal proofs for a verified toolchain.

We're not quite there yet, but while regular programming is quite tough for AI due to how fuzzy it is, formal proofs are something AI is already very good at.

if-then-high-chance logic is for sex education & prototypes, not for airplanes carrying insured passengers