That's an interesting idea, but it would also mean that all we know about human history is either made-up, or happened within the Matrix, because a world of humans that never sleep would look very different. It would also mean everything we know about other mammals is wrong too, since they all sleep too. Still, this seems more interesting than the idea that humanity peaked in 1999 and then sometime after that the machines took over and built the matrix and humans are somehow energy producers. But looking back, the idea that humanity peaked around 1999 doesn't seem too far-fetched...
Babies certainly did not evolve to waste valuable time and resources on crying nonstop for no good reason, they likely do so only because something is not quite right. A more optimistic take is that they do it to develop the pipes, and the nonstop crying will pay off later with a great voice.
And there are sources of colic that have nothing to do with digestion - a quick perusal of WebMD lists noise/light sensitivity, nervous system misfires, and baby migraines (poor babies)!
Colic certainly might be an indicator that something is not quite right, but that doesn't mean there's always something you can do about it. As I write this with my exhausted newborn son sleeping in my arms, sometimes you just have to wait for them to grow out of it.
EDIT: I looked into this a little more since I'm pinned by a sleepy baby and as with everything with babies it's complicated. Here's a study that shows that formula-fed babies cry more at 2 weeks than breast-fed babies, but less at 6 weeks: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10193923/
This is probably also hindered by the fact that "colic" is an imprecise term - all babies cry, but at a certain point if they cry enough you call it "colic".
It's equivalent to moving to eggs, and getting morally immature individuals immediately get a full grown body. I might be mistaken, but it feels like reversing the whole evolutionary process that brought humans, when as a species we're currently pretty well adjusted to our earth environment. I don't think "nature" or evolution should be seen in a positive way just for the sake of it, but our whole history has consistently extended the childhood period, and we're still pointing at young adults as immature.
It's of course a different story if you're planning on dominating earth with an army of clones, or dominating space with a fleet of soldiers.
ISWYDT, nice one
So non-avian reptiles are forced into the niche of ambush predators (snakes, crocodiles), or they have to stay small and rely on stealth (lizards).
Because there are certain similarities between the homeothermy of birds and that of mammals that seem less likely to be coincidences, there exists an alternative hypothesis, that homeothermy and fast metabolism has already evolved in the ancestor of all amniotes.
Later, in the ancestors of crocodyles, of turtles and in that of lizards and snakes (both etymologically and cladistically, it would be better to apply the term "reptiles" only to lizards and snakes), poikilothermy and slow metabolism have evolved as an adaptation that allows the reptiles to live using much less food than needed by birds and mammals.
This reversal appears especially likely for crocodiles, whose ancestors were terrestrial and agile.
Such a reversal is also consistent with the fact that reptiles need a high body temperature for a normal activity, unlike the amphibians, for which there is no doubt that they did not have an ancestor with homeothermy. To reach their required body temperature, reptiles need to use external sources, e.g. basking in sun light. Because of their dependence on external sources of heat, reptiles become rare or completely absent in colder climates, where amphibians are still abundant.
Reptiles are just as evolved as mammals. So their metabolism is not primitive, it's just not high-intensive.
> Because there are certain similarities between the homeothermy of birds and that of mammals that seem less likely to be coincidences, there exists an alternative hypothesis, that homeothermy and fast metabolism has already evolved in the ancestor of all amniotes.
Nope. Warm-blooded metabolism is not that hard to evolve, it's just that the intermediate stages are not viable in the presence of very adapted mammals with which you'll have to compete.
For example, tegu lizards are optionally endothermic. They can raise their body temperature by more than 10C, they use that during the mating season.
> Later, in the ancestors of crocodyles, of turtles and in that of lizards and snakes
Crocodiles and snakes are just as [un]related as birds and mammals. If you want to separate birds from crocodiles, then you need to include mammals into reptiles.
The Gorn would like a word with you.
There are mammals that lay eggs, for example, the platypus [1].