Oh, quique.goni@scanoss.com exists. HM. I wonder if maybe you might have some bias in this?
What CoC did we violate, by the way? You're the ones who came into my repo with a bot and used a bot to tell me not to swear. Which, again, is a violation of GH TOS.
I have not falsified information, impersonated anyone, or extorted anyone. If I have, I welcome you to show it. Make a blog post, post it here, whatever.
Hell, sue me. I've emailed you guys with my personal email a few times and offered to call on Zoom or with phone.
As for "or their guardians" I'm an adult, though given you're pretending not be associated with your employer I'm questioning if anyone at ScanOSS is.
What the actual fuck.
If someone is doing ACTUAL crimes like that you report them to the real authorities. And not open a GitHub Issue.
But we know they’re not actually doing those things are anything like it. They have four letter words in their code and you’re insane.
You just opened this account, either fake or you’re an actual SCANOSS employee, to try to damage control against your boss’s goofy scanner that embarrassed him.
> Quique Goñi: I’m joining this discussion because within my organization, we use the purl2cpe repository daily. To leave a comment, you need to create an account, as I just did. The account creation process is far too simple and lacks proper authentication measures, meaning anyone could easily impersonate someone else."
It's SCANOSS's fork.
> which could potentially go against GitHub’s rules
Not potentially, it does.
> we use the purl2cpe repository daily
Great, but not this fork. This fork is from SCANOSS, and I chose a repo which hard cursing (albeit due a dependency) to make my point of their hypocrisy.
> challenge those who think that knowing how to use ChatGPT makes them programmers
You really ought to look at who has commented in that thread, from well known cryptographers to other business owners. Attacking the people, rather than discussing the topic at hand, won't get us anywhere. I have not once accused SCANOSS of being bad programmers, bad at their job, etc. because, frankly, they're probably not. It's, seemingly, a successful business with reasonable development procedures. It's just that it seems they're in desperate need of ethics and PR knowledge.
> meaning anyone could easily impersonate someone else.
Interesting, from another account made just now, to be the only other defending SCANOSS. I don't think anybody impersonated Quique, because unlike SCANOSS, nobody - that I've talked to at least - is coming from a place of malice. We simply want an apology and acknowledgment wrong was done.
---
Honestly, this entire comment was confusing, and written in a style that makes me suspect of it's legitimacy, as ironic as that is.
What the actual fuck.
If someone is doing ACTUAL crimes like that you report them to the real authorities. And not open a GitHub Issue.
But we know they’re not actually doing those things are anything like it. They have four letter words in their code and you’re insane.