It's quite funny you use the term 'low effort' to describe comments here, when you've clearly not done enough research to realise that your idea is not at all novel. Not to mention the youtube video is just a longwinded advertisement, and the article you've written is very poorly articulated.

There are multiple sentences in it that make me think this is all a big joke:

Like: "Languages must be homoiconic", but then you immediately show a language that is NOT homoiconic.

And also "Microprogramming works incredibly well with LLMs. It is easy to mix and match microprograms written by humans with microprograms written by LLMs.", but then show nothing to actually demonstrate that; no demo or even example code. Did you fine tune a model yet? You don't even mention a possible LLM model by name.

And finally: "If the microprogramming trend becomes as big, if not bigger, than microservices, I would not be surprised." I'm sorry but this is hilarious, especially because the vast majority of software out there is not written as a set of microservices, because it's simply the wrong model for most apps, like mobile apps for instance.