This is top-to-bottom 100% nonsense composed out of imagined facts. Please do not contribute this.
State what's not factual instead of just saying it's not factual. Otherwise I can easily say your statement is 100% top-down, in-and-out, all-around, unsubstantiated.
Meanwhile back in reality: Jack Dorsey being involved from the beginning
So what? Others simply don't attach the same importance to this that you do. Last time I looked he was all in on Nostr, which doesn't fit with your theory at all.
Where does Gaddafi come into this? That seems like a complete non-sequitur with the previous sentence talking about people involved in Start-ups in the early 2010s.
Gaddafi was overthrown as part of the Arab Spring. He wasn’t a guy involved in tech startups in the early 2010s hence my confusion as to how he was related to Aaron Swartz.
Ah you misread, I'm saying anyone reading the comment who was active in startups during that time would know about those events.