> YouTube accounted for 8.5% of total TV viewing in May, while Netflix was a close second at 7.9%.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/howardhomonoff/2023/06/28/summe...
Assuming that's true, I still don't think it matters that much.
I expect that a very large proportion of Netflix that's watched is watched on a smart TV. Much larger than the proportion of Youtube that's watched on a TV.
I'd have assumed most people's proportions were similar and that therefore the proportions for the two services were similar; that is to say, for people who use both kinds of devices to watch video, I wouldn't have expected a big difference based on the specific service.
Do you have a source that suggests that people who use both kinds of devices watch a larger proportion of Netflix on the TV but a larger proportion of Youtube on PC?
I do turn to YouTube if I need some kind of visual guide, like for auto repair sometimes, but it's rare.
Most links to YouTube videos I find are excruciatingly slow explanations of something that could be done in two paragraphs and one screenshot, or some kind of meme that I don't find funny.
My current car has a particular enthusiast that has a personal site with detailed text-with-photographs guides to most of the common repairs, and it's awesome.
When I buy my next car I'll probably buy a repair manual to go with it.
For a few things I've found where youtube has some specific content I'm interested in, I'll use yt-dlp to download and archive it to watch outside of youtube.com.
youtube is always in the top 5 for most time spent and visits. "representative" of the typical web user certainly includes youtube
I’m sorry, what? The typical web user is on a phone unplugged from the wall.
If I look online for stats relating to use of the YouTube app in the UK, it's 20 hours a month. If that's distributed equally across the month, that's definitely not 1.5 hours in any one sitting.
I haven't been longer than 15 minutes on YouTube - in total within the past 2 years. So certainly not representative for me.
"Representative for me" is incoherent. You're not a population; you don't have population statistics.
But saying YouTube must be included is like saying that most people watch YouTube, which is certainly not true at all.
So yes, YouTube must absolutely be included. And it should be included as the second most-tested site.