Hacker News Reader

Comment by yieldcrv | Hacker News Reader

Should have sold it to the Israelis

NSO Group would have paid more, quicker

It's unclear that NSO group is interested in gaining access to iCloud accounts or Photos, nor is it clear that this entrypoint is something that would meet the bar or be useful for signals intelligence, since it requires sending a calendar invite and clicking on the attachment.

Bug bounties will pay for any bug. Offensive firms only pay for things that are practical, and they don't pay everything up front---it depends on the lifetime of the exploit. The business model is closer to a subscription or services.

There is no reason to believe NSO group would pay more, and they certainly wouldn't pay quicker.

> since it requires sending a calendar invite and clicking on the attachment.

I thought it was a zero click exploit?

As for being interested in iCloud and photos, is the argument that the people they’re looking to attack are unlikely to use iCloud? Cause otherwise getting photos and potentially email access seems quite valuable.

The bigger thing here I think is that the target platform is macOS. An important detail to internalize about major grey market buyers of vulnerabilities: they tend not to stockpile; every vulnerability they buy they need to maintain, and there's not much benefit to maintaining vulnerabilities you aren't going to use. There is, how should we put this, probably not a whole lot of scarcity in macOS RCE vulnerabilities? It would be wild to learn that a threat actor at NSO's scale doesn't already have macOS (and Windows, and Ubuntu) wired for sound already.

(This stockpiling thing isn't me guessing; it's something I learned pretty recently).

I'd assume most western journalists would have Mac laptops.

No idea what portion non-western journalists use Macs.

Again I'll say I'm not axiomatically reconstructing the relative values of exploits on different platforms, and observe that this is something you can go research and learn about. No, macOS exploits are not as valuable as iOS exploits.

> Bug bounties will pay for any bug.

This one didn't.

No they would not have.

No he shouldn’t.

That mentality is cancerous to society.

Yes that is right! That is cancerous. Apple, not paying the peanuts as a bounty, is fully responsible for spreading these terminal diseases.

so is not paying a bug bounty

Reply on news.ycombinator.com