Also will entrench the user in a walled garden ecosystem from a very specific giant tech company that isn't big on making their products compatible with other companies.
Also will entrench the user in a walled garden ecosystem from a very specific giant tech company that isn't big on making their products compatible with other companies.
- it's not an argument against using AirPods as an aid with mild hearing loss if you're already an iPhone user
- it's not necessarily a great argument against buying an iPhone and iPods Pro anyway, given that hearing aids can easily run hundreds or even thousands of dollars more than that combination
- the vast majority of smart phone customers, both on and off HN, have either factored "walled garden" into their buying considerations at this point or never will
- let's not pretend Samsung is not already trying to figure out how to cram this into their next Galaxy Buds for Android users anyway, which will somehow work best with Samsung phones, not so well with other Android phones, and not at all with iPhones, but nobody will really complain about it because whatevs, it's not Apple
Are you suggesting AirPods aren't Bluetooth 5.3 and aren't compatible with Bluetooth audio sources? Or that it doesn't play AAC, MP3, and FLAC?
The proprietary capabilities (such as instant smart switching between active devices) are all incremental, taking nothing away from normal Bluetooth usage.
Better wait for more open competition to catch up unless you are already deep in their ecosystem and not intending to move.
It's frustrating that the settings can't be changed on Android, and macOS seems to have a subset of settings compared to iOS.
Automatic device switching doesn’t work but that doesn’t work on my Sony headphones either.
They're not FDA approved as hearing aids, so they're not hearing aids.
Either way, pointing to another company being shitty isn't really a good justification of the first company being shitty.
Personally I thinks it's shitty when anybody does it.
This is GP's problem? What should GP do to solve this problem? (Seriously asking, even though this probably sounds sarcastic). Should GP tap them on the shoulder or try to wave them down or something to get their attention? What if they don't want to be bothered? What about the sibling comment ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41533796 ) about it being a feature not a bug? If GP were to tap that person or get their attention someway, it seems that it would be unwanted.
isn’t it good to have multiple options so consumers can pick what they value?