Unity is still better than Godot in a lot of ways (mainly the support ecosystem), but by March that might be different. Godot is catching up quickly. It has more momentum behind it than possibly any other open source project I've experienced.
I like Godot but its open source nature means it does have some rough edges, mostly around GDScript but framework features like tilemap implementation, model imports and physics have always been a bit wonky.
You're attributing a lack in Godot you feel to it being open source. Given the commercial success of other open source projects like Blender, I don't think this is a fair or measured take.
This isn't meant to be a slight against open source, just an acknowledgement of the tradeoffs of an open development model. Something like a game framework or model editor can't reach a certain level of maturity until actual professionals in the field care enough to contribute, because of the knowledge gatekept within those industries, and their expertise. Most free software contributors will necessarily be amateurs and hobbyists, and that will likewise limit the quality of the end product.
Everything we do is for selfish reasons and that's good actually, as it means we have real motivation to help others.
Some people deliberately die to save others. Where is the selfish part in that behaviour?