That being said 156 weeks is a bit ridiculous. No wonder the birth rates are so low.
That being said 156 weeks is a bit ridiculous. No wonder the birth rates are so low.
It seems that WA isn't at 100% of your salary. Afaik, this is common where the state provides a capped benefit and the company will pay the remainder. So if say the company did 24 weeks and the state only did 12 then the state+company pays you for 12 and then just the company pays for the next 12.
[1]: https://kingcounty.gov/en/legacy/audience/employees/pay-bene...
Anyway, if we're talking about spacing 2 - 3 years apart, that means you're not working at all. At some point people will want to go back to work, and that may mean not having another kid.
I think flexible policies are great, but the long leaves I don't think are super useful. Kids are not some abnormal condition; they need to be integrated into a full life.
This is just my pet theory. I think places with overly long leaves (especially overly long paternity leaves) actually discourage men from wanting more children (And of course it takes two to tango here).