To avoid strike, Boeing promises 25% pay hike–and to build next jet in Seattle
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
[1] https://www.boeing.com/content/dam/boeing/boeingdotcom/speci...
[2] https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=1&year1=202007...
> 12 weeks of paid parental leave
This is a joke, right? At Airbus (France) it's 16 (min) to 156 (max) weeks, paid 100%. [1]
> reduced mandatory overtime
Mandatory? OMG! I would learn french, quick!
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parental_leave#Europe_and_Cent...
That being said 156 weeks is a bit ridiculous. No wonder the birth rates are so low.
It seems that WA isn't at 100% of your salary. Afaik, this is common where the state provides a capped benefit and the company will pay the remainder. So if say the company did 24 weeks and the state only did 12 then the state+company pays you for 12 and then just the company pays for the next 12.
[1]: https://kingcounty.gov/en/legacy/audience/employees/pay-bene...
Anyway, if we're talking about spacing 2 - 3 years apart, that means you're not working at all. At some point people will want to go back to work, and that may mean not having another kid.
I think flexible policies are great, but the long leaves I don't think are super useful. Kids are not some abnormal condition; they need to be integrated into a full life.
This is just my pet theory. I think places with overly long leaves (especially overly long paternity leaves) actually discourage men from wanting more children (And of course it takes two to tango here).
And, you are not paid for your 156 weeks of parental leave