Hacker News Reader

Your point is fair, but this is a problem to be solved, not to throw up our hands and say it is impossible. EVs work for many people and use cases today; those for which they don't are the body of work to work towards solutions.

I recently worked, for free on my own time, to help a condo association to plan and install infrastructure to support 200 charging stations across two buildings with ~100 units. Total time investment was ~8 hours. A few folks paid to plug into that infra, but those buildings are now future proof.

If you want help, I can reach out; let me know. We will electrify all the things, because we must [1].

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41453394

How about another problem: supply of electricity and then its price? For those of us who don't drive but use electricity, we are going to experience much higher prices of electricity when the masses are forced to drive electric cars. I don't think much thought has gone into planning for this huge demand.

The other problem i see with electric cars is the how long it takes to charge. I'm sure people will respond and say that's just another problem to solve but I just don't see charging ever being as fast as filling up at a gas station. Clearly the activity of using an electric car is going to be different from how an ICE powered car has been used. Has anyone written about this?

> An analysis by KPMG says the U.S. currently has enough generating capability to charge 80 million EVs during overnight hours—hence the need to control when cars are charged. The Edison Electric Institute estimates there could be 26 million EVs on the road by 2030, up from about 3.2 million today. [1] [2]

Most people will charge overnight (either at home or the office), the average daily round trip commute is ~40 miles (1-2 hours of charging at a level 2 charger to replenish this range, depending on current available). Fast DC charging can be performed in 15-20 minutes, depending on state of charge of the battery and the charging station. My Tesla, when supercharging at the grocery store, is finished faster than I finish shopping (for example).

[1] https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2023/07/char...

[2] https://www.wsj.com/articles/url-us-power-grid-electric-vehi...

Thanks for the links. I should have included AI in my Doomsday scenario. AI is very power hungry. Of course AI server farms will not be spread out the way electric charging stations are but will be more concentrated but I do know tech CEO's are already looking at Canada to supply the expected electricity demand. That suggests to me there isn't enough capacity in the USA to meet that forecasted demand.

>My Tesla, when supercharging at the grocery store, is finished faster than I finish shopping (for example). Where I'm at, the number of charging stations at the grocery store is already inadequate. They are always full. I see people with electric cars wanting to "get a spot" with a charger and there isn't any. This is what I mean about the lack of planning. The govt assumes that the market will meet demand but I just think mandating all cars be electric and relying on the market to meet that sudden demand is naïve.

Conversely, it is silly that we simply default to combustion vehicles because they are easy and we are lazy. Work is hard, and nothing in this thread described cannot be solved with existing technology. Maybe we could be less lazy? Maybe!

> hence the need to control when cars are charged

People hate this idea, but this likely one of the biggest improvement we can make on how we utilise excess power.

Imagine everyone plugs in after work, start charging whenever peak ends, either 9PM or 11PM. By 3AM most of the cars are done charging, yet there's 4 hours of off-peak capacity left not utilised. Whats worse, we'll see massive peaks around 9PM if we do not manage charging on wider scale.

I think a big barrier is that people used to ICEs want to charge EVs the same way they fill up with gas.

One of the things I had to “unlearn” was wanting to charge to 100% every time. There are many arguments for not doing this, one of which is charging speed.

Another thing I found is that driving an EV makes road trips more enjoyable and less draining because it forces me to take breaks. But it took me a while to fully embrace that.

Increasing the supply of electricity is trivial, especially today with the advent of cheap and reliable solar. As more EVs join the grid, more capacity will be added, the same as any other technology. Crypto is a great example – Bitcoin scaled up to eating a noticeable chunk of all electricity in the world without anyone batting an eye.

Nobody is being "forced" to drive an electric car – people are buying them because they have much better performance than traditional cars. Quieter, faster, lower maintenance costs, etc.

I spend way less time refueling my car since switching to electric, as many owners will tell you. I just plug my car in about once per week before going to bed.

> Your point is fair, but this is a problem to be solved, not to throw up our hands and say it is impossible.

I don't think anyone is saying it's impossible. They're saying it's a problem right now, and that's a large part of why so many people avoid EVs.

If someone figures out a way to mitigate that problem tomorrow, then the equation changes. But tomorrow isn't here today, and people have needs to met today.

And if the problem is solved and people still choose hybrids or combustion vehicles? You can solve All The Problems and humans can still make irrational, suboptimal choices. What is good enough to make the lizard brain cozy with the EV choice? Not rhetorical! Genuinely interested in the thought.

Here's my lizard brain issue: owning and using an EV requires more planning / is less flexible at least while liquid fuel is so easily accessible.

With liquid fueled vehicles, I can park them wherever at home. If I had an EV, I'd need to pick a spot and always park it there when I want to charge it. If that's inside the garage, I need to keep the garage clean or I can't charge, etc. It's better if I charge with 120v cause I can plug it in anywhere, but then charging is slow. Even if I usually park my liquid fueled vehicle in the garage, I can park it outside for a week or two if I take a big delivery for a group buy and need to have everyone else come and pick it up.

If I move, I have to be picky about where I move; if there's no charging infrastructure, my car turns into a pumpkin.

If I go on a long trip, I need to plan for charging on the way and my destination. From experience with my PHEV, I need to be extra careful because some chargers are impossible to use because their payment system doesn't work; some chargers are impossible to use because they've gone wireless (I seriously saw a charger at a mall that had no cable, wtf).

Driving a liquid fueled vehicle, if the gauge works, I don't need to plan for fueling unless driving through undeveloped areas and there's usually signs like 'no services for 78 miles'. Even without a working gauge, if you keep a gas can, running out of fuel in a developed area is easy to recover from, especially now when you can open a map on your phone and know which way to walk.

There's a car I'm interested in being revealed next month, but it's almost certainly EV only, so it's going to be a no. I don't want to have to think about how to fuel my vehicle.

Also, market rate EV charging out and about seems to be about 2x home electricity prices near me, which means I'd be grumpy if I charged away from home.

>There's a car I'm interested in being revealed next month, but it's almost certainly EV only

Care to share what car that is? Always looking to see what's up and coming.

The new Scout. My first car was a 1978 Scout II, and I'm actually car shopping at the moment, so it could work. This week they said they're going to have a reveal October 24.

I am dumb enough to buy a first model year vehicle. I had the 2017 Chrysler Pacifica (which I ditched earlier this year because of signs of engine failure), and I have a deposit on a Lexus TX (currently under stop sale because of a pending airbag fix), but I'm still shopping if I only have a deposit down.

People still buy mechanical watches despite the fact that a solid state watch tuned to an atomic clock via gps is in every way better. In fact they pay a ton of money for the luxury of a worse device! But as a proportion of all clocks mechanical clocks are effectively non existent.

> a solid state watch tuned to an atomic clock via gps is in every way better.

It's not better in every way, or that's the only sort people would buy. It's better at timekeeping, but timekeeping isn't the only reason why people buy watches.

Watches don’t contribute to climate change.

EV and non-EV cars both do, and the choice to have and own a "classic" non-EV {muscle car | spaceship fin styling | 1930s steam powered racing car, etc.} is similar to the choice to have a "classic" mechanic watch .. which would be the point made in the comment you replied to.

In the overall big picture of timekeeping and transportation the proportion of fully wooden complication watches and Mad Max interceptors would ideally be relatively low.

( but rolling coal will remain popular for some years to come )

And the thread overall is about EVs being drastically simpler machines give them an insurmountable long term advantage to the point that ICE will become anachronistic, and hybrids are even worse than ICE for their complexity. The environmental angle is a non-sequitur.

I would note that EVs are much more likely to have a minimal environmental impact over time as the requisite is electrical storage, not a specific way to store electricity. As electro magnetism is a fundamental property of the universe the ways we achieve that are limitless. Carbon based fuel is pretty much the only meaningful ICE option so there’s not much to improve on there beyond marginal efficiency gains. (I mean I guess we could use liquid fuels like oxygen and hydrogen but that seems unlikely). N.b,. Hydrogen fuel cells are still electric vehicles.

> I would note that EVs are much more likely to have a minimal environmental impact over time

That would be the ideal goal but we (globally) have good way to go yet.

> I mean I guess we could use liquid fuels like oxygen and hydrogen ..

Pragmatically it'd be hydrogen (maybe) in transport trucking on established routes (to minimise infrastructure) and green hydrogen products (ammonia | methanol) for bulk carrier distance transportation to generate central station power (in, say, European winters) for use in EV's.

There's no Engineering (civil | mechanical) upside to hydrogen liquid|gas in mass numbers of small personal vehicles - too slippery to handle with stringent safety requirements to avoid issues with a billion small deployments.

> And if the problem is solved and people still choose hybrids?

If that's the case, then there's still a problem that hasn't been adequately solved.

But that's a hypothetical. The reality is that there are real, nonimaginary showstopper problems right now.

However, I assure you, the power and telephone company have dispensation to drill holes and run lines. These are regulatory constraints that are basically not real but are convenient functions to induce a behavior, but are easily and summarily dismissed when the political will exists to achieve some outcome. These constrains are point in time and aren’t fundamental like the complexity argument - which is reality based. The constraints you live under may be your emergent reality, but it’s not actually reality.

> cotton mill built in the 1800s

Surprised you are allowed cars then. Perhaps stick to horses and see if state changes their mind.

How in the world do you remember to put gas in your car? Are you getting stranded on the side of the road with no gas all the time? Don't drive? How in the world do you manage anything else in your life? You are painting a picture that having to remember (or be reminded) to do anything in your life is 100% impossible.

Putting gas in the car requires taking an immediate action and then being done. Charging an EV requires plugging it in for an extended time and then remembering to retrieve it (when the charger is a shared resource). I could easily believe that the former is easier.

With modern chargers you effectively park at a strip mall, go pee and get a coffee, then get back in your car and continue your journey until the coffee makes you pee again.

Right, which means you have to make time for it. Sure, you can make up stuff to do while you wait, but it's still a long enough amount of time that you have to work it into your schedule. Filling a tank is quick enough that you don't have to do that. You can just fill your tank on an as-needed basis without planning for it.