Pixel shift would be amazing for specific use cases, but Canon only offers it in JPEG. Serious shooters who would use this feature would be shooting in raw.
Another example is their issuance of one video-centric (or at least "hybrid") camera after another that's crippled by an insulting and nearly-useless micro-HDMI port, while everyone else offers full-sized HDMI.
I have a decent investment in Canon lenses; but after waiting and waiting for Canon to pull its head out of its ass and compete (especially in terms of video capability), I think I have to jump ship.
It's like Apple wanting you to buy a phone, tablet, and watch.
Canon is clinging to laurels that are long gone. And this is coming from a longtime Canon shooter who likes their still-image quality. They need an FX3 killer, pronto.
Sony makes top notch sensors and fairly mediocre cameras, and sensor development is something that has been leapfrogged multiple times in history.
Nikon is the one that has a decent chance of dethroning Canon, unless canon ups their RF lens game.
I don't assume anything about their market share; just the specs they currently offer. I wish Canon were more competitive for video shooters.
We'll see what happens with Nikon & Red.
:P Feels like a page out of the Apple playbook…
“There’s a dongle for that”