Hacker News Reader

Comment by llm_trw | Hacker News Reader

Victorians put a lot of energy on safety. It's just that the safety they cared about was vastly different to what were the actual things killing them.

If you want a modern take on it observe our obsession with stranger danger for children while we happily fill them up with plastic.

View on HN

What was the safety they cared about?

For one thing, they really seem to have worried about accidentally being buried alive:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_coffin

It is unclear to me how prevalent those fears were. The device was invented sure, someone had this fear or someone thought someone did, but how common was that really.

They were desperately concerned about women’s uteruses falling out and wanted them to avoid strenuous activities like reading fiction.

I'm curious as well.

How many children are expected to eventually die from plastic?

Well we don't know If microplastics are really bad. Let's just assume they are mildly toxic. Since the high amount of children on earth it will still be millions seriously affected.

You have microplastic in your balls (if you have them). They're in your brain [0] - 0.5% by mass, which is 50% more than 8 years ago.

They're in the Mariana Trench, and Everest, and the rain.

And production is still rising.

0 - https://edition.cnn.com/2024/08/23/health/plastics-in-brain-...

Well, start with BPAs. Then add PFOAs (ie goretex, jackets are cca pure plastic). Micro/nano plastics themselves are still unknown, but those first two have already caused some significant damage. How do you count rate of cancer X raised by some tiny % Y on hundreds of millions of kids, billions if counting longer timescales since plastics were old news even in 80s?

If you think eating plastics is fine, feel free to start chewing some of it daily, of course lowest quality and price.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com