The people in charge of pay and hiring will never, ever, ever set things up such that they're considered less important or are paid less.
The people in charge of pay and hiring will never, ever, ever set things up such that they're considered less important or are paid less.
At investment banks, it's quite possible for a star trader or I-banker to be paid more than the CEO.
An NFL head coach is almost certainly paid less than the starting QB, and possibly other positions. The general manager is paid far less than many players.
HR and accounting get paid less than engineers in every country on earth
I have seen cases where I made more than my boss (the difference was a few hundred/year), but it wasn't long before they promoted my boss so that wasn't the case. (I'm convinced that it was only allowed to happen just long enough to say it was possible and then when nobody was looking they promoted him to ensure it doesn't become a pattern)
I only had a tiny bit of freedom within a pay band.
Management is in charge of this, if it is hard to jump bands it is because management wants it to be hard.
Not in Argentina
Seen it many times where engineers are making more than their managers. I had jobs where there was no real difference between my pay and my direct manager's.
There were fewer programmers for each programmer's role than managers for each manager's. Not sure if it still applies though.