> If every Android, Blackberry, and iPhone came with a
> universal QR code reader it MIGHT be worth it, but
> none of them do, ...
My phone has a built-in QR reader, and it's one of the ones you've mentioned, so that statement is wrong. > ... you have to provide printed material or a url
> anyways so there is no real reason to use them now.
Except that for those who do have a reader, you've reduced the friction for them. And it sounds like you're saying we shouldn't use new technologies just because some people don't have them yet. That's in interesting idea - it means web developers shouldn't use HTML5, or canvas, for example. Perhaps this is a good idea. Not everyone has Flash capable browsers, so we could finally kill that.Oh, and never write something for the iPhone, because not everyone has one of those, either.
Long home button press.
<beep>
"Siri (or Android version, or WP12 version) , search for <whatever the thing is>"
<beep>
<Here are your search results>
To me, people talking out loud to their phones in public is akin to bluetooth headsets.
The technology might provide an easier way to let you do something, but you look like an idiot.
I am curious though, how do you distinguish between people "talking out loud to their phones", and people talking out loud to other people using their phones (ie making a phone call).
Note that I think QR codes are great for things like airline tickets or baggage tracking tags.
1) Open camera from lock screen 2) Take photo 3) If QR code is detected, offer to open it. 4) Later when browsing photos, remember it's a QR code, offer the link again, so that we can come back to it later. 5) If no QR code is detected, treat it as a normal photo.