Hacker News Reader

This sentence has no substance. It gives the reader nothing to understand why MongoDB has both happy customers some who have been disappointed.

The explanation is in the paragraph before it

except its factually incorrect when applied to Mongo[1].

You can also shard with postgres, how is that a USP of Mongo?

I didn't say it is a usp for mongo. Only saying that there is a lack of substance behind the mongo criticism in the article.