I would be quite happy brain-wise with ChatGPT being able to answer any multiple choice question with 100% accuracy. Such an ability is not creativity as I understand the term, but it is difficult.

Regarding your argument, "the first 3 are essentially different from the 4th", the point is you (and the article) haven't shown why. Your argument is that "Such behaviors are extremely far away from what an AI can do today. They might become possible some day" which is exactly what was said about chess in the 70s.