> While our study did not differentiate between methods of cannabis consumption
That's one way of saying your study was useless.
That's one way of saying your study was useless.
If that's all the study says, then it does not add to existing knowledge, and really isn't about cannabis at all.
That's a kind of uselessness.
So why was the study conducted (this way), and why does CNN consider it newsworthy?
The answers to those questions might be more interesting than the study itself.
Did you ever make a tube full of dryer sheets to blow smoke through to eliminate the smell? What did you call those? We called them smurfers.
I like regional slang a lot.
Those were a staple of the college dorm but didn't have a name for it until now!