> The notion that traffic ratios have anything to do with whether it makes sense to peer and whether someone should pay as long been debunked in the internet context.
Do note how the comment does not mention peering ratios. An ISP being a "hog" does not need to be determined by the peering ratio.
> https://drpeering.net/white-papers/The-Folly-Of-Peering-Rati...
This is a very good article, but it does not directly address the above. It is very specific to arguments about peering ratio. If you have no opinions on peering ratios, you have to read between the lines to get opinions on the original comment.
In Argument #2 counter argument #1: "This is a valid observation ... This is not however an argument for using Peering traffic ratios to restrict Peering."
> And you're also wrong but what neutrality is.
Just saying they are wrong is not helpful. You provide no evidence that "Net Neutrality" has not shifted in meaning since the 90s.