Help me out here. You want fewer or no stop signs and instead to rely on “proper education for drivers”? What is the problem you’re aiming to solve with that?
Help me out here. You want fewer or no stop signs and instead to rely on “proper education for drivers”? What is the problem you’re aiming to solve with that?
The way stop signs are used in North America basically assumes that everyone is incredibly stupid and cannot be trusted with a dull stick. Perhaps that has something to do with this individualistic bend and a hatred for collective well-being and the general fabric of society; I don't know.
Cherry on top are speed bumps placed 30' before a stop sign. That's just plain moronic. A speed bump (or a raised crosswalk) would work perfectly well with a stop sign -- both signage and physical infrastructure indicating the need to stop. But, of course we won't build it that way!
The idea comes from intersections in southeast Asia for example. It's a massive free for all with higher safety rates than signalled intersections. In the face of uncertainty, drivers slow and focus on situational awareness and negotiation. That this is actually safer, is counterintuitive.
Which goes go the larger thesis, over reliance on signaling. An idea that if you blindly follow the rules, that you'll be safe. It's the reason you should hesitate look both ways when proceeding from an intersection - to make sure someone else is not barreling thru, and that you're not blindly proceeding on the green to then get t-boned.
"Safety" rates in southeast Asian nations are not the same thing as collision rates.
In most of the southeast Asian nations I've visited, people don't care all that much if their cars get dinged up, scratched, or sideswiped at intersections. It's just part of the gradual demolition derby of life.
That won't fly in high-income places where people value how their cars look.
unrelated but i love the poetry in this sentence :)