No, I'm just saying the analogy isn't apt.

But on the broader argument, saying people just don't like it because it puts them out of jobs also seems to miss the point.

Disruptive technologies of the kind that "put people put out of jobs" usually just replace labour, ie. mechanised looms, calculators and computers, rather than replacing the result of one's labour. Often this is a distinction without any meaningful difference, but when we're talking about art and creative work products I think it's significant.