Carrot Weather has a mode that is almost a replacement for Dark Sky, btw, though the location-based alerts have gotten less and less reliable over the years (which I am completely unable to understand).
Carrot Weather has a mode that is almost a replacement for Dark Sky, btw, though the location-based alerts have gotten less and less reliable over the years (which I am completely unable to understand).
Also, FWIW this post is from 2023, and the Weather app has improved significantly since then.
For example, the post references a Reddit comment complaining about the lack of a precipitation map:
> there anything that has the precipitation graph similar to dark sky
This is available in Weather app. You can see the hourly graph, and you can also see the map with precipitation overlay.
The notification feature you ask for is also supported.
I repeat my original question: can anyone actually name a feature from DarkSky that isn’t present in the current Weather app?
I had turned mine off, probably from way back when I used Dark Sky and didn't want redundant notifications.
There was also a "Check out Cool Storms" feature that let you see the weather map for an interesting storm that was happening at the moment.
Notifications were also more configurable. You could set it to notify you if the precipitation chance were higher than a certain percentage or if the high were below or above a certain temp.
Easy. As the screenshots show, the DarkSky main page would _dynamically adjust_ the information it shows you: adding radar, precip level, combined precip/temperature forcecast, etc. The fact that those elements can be found individually by poking through three or four screens in the Weather app doesn't make them equivalent.
As others have already mentioned, the fact that it displayed weather information in a clear and uncluttered way, and had a simple user interface. Apple Weather is a gaudy mess.
But, I don’t have any domain knowledge in this area. Perhaps, it is just more difficult due to climate change or other factors.
Things like the funding of NOAA or reallocation of funds within it can impact NOAA's ability to provide the data that is used to drive this (and other) weather and climate decisions. https://www.federaltimes.com/opinions/2024/04/30/noaas-budge...
I personally find, I’ve had to learn how to read a weather map to get a good understanding of forecasts
Is this done via some automated system, or do pilots report it manually?
I’d be curious to read more about this - do weather companies have partnerships with airlines where they pay them to carry sensors?
> do weather companies have partnerships with airlines where they pay them to carry sensors?
Nearly all of the US's forecasts come from the NOAA. Nearly every other "weather company" is simply reformatting this data.
I can't remember exactly what video I watched on the topic, but these two may be interesting:
I sometimes think that the reason Dark Sky was so good is that it spent a lot of money on the data side of things and probably refreshed their data and models much more than a larger company would. They were probably burning their money quite fast. As a function of the acquisition Apple tried to reduce the spend on data/processing while keeping the functions (it didn't succeed). Weather app has the same problem.
All in all - seems like a well traveled road: nimble company trying to acquire new customers/market has better features until large companies take over and drive profit/revenue - diluting quality and pushing away customers. (different incentives)