It does contribute to air pollution, but that's more of a problem in a city, where it's diluted over a smaller area.
I did once look into whether it would be possible to run a carbon negative BBQ by doing wood pyrolysis of renewable wood and ending up with black carbon to bury. It does seem possible, but still has the air quality issue. And there's a risk that you'd emit some methane (if you fail to burn it), which would be bad. Also, I wasn't sure how to figure out whether it would emit more CO than a normal BBQ. In theory that would be the best case for carbon though.
Pyrolysis happens when you heat wood in a chamber with low ventilation (low oxygen) , which causes flammable gases (methane, CO etc) to be emitted, leaving black carbon. The flammable gases are then burned separately, to sustain the process and also to heat whatever you want. Methane burns at hot enough temperatures to power a pizza oven; so in theory you could construct one powered by pyrolysis, but it isn't going to happen in an unmodified one. A normal one should be constructed to ventilate the wood well, to avoid emitting too much CO.
There is a video on youtube of some guy pyrolizing some wood by putting a metal box with it in in his oven - it's not rocket science. But I live in a city, so in the end it didn't seem like a good idea to experiment with it.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-24/tree-bark...
HN: if you glance at this person's comment history, it's clear they're commenting here for bad-faith politics trolling. They don't genuinely believe the provocative things they write—they're trying to get a rise out of you.
>> repeatedly hit by climate-change induced typhoons here
>There, found another cult member.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40957086
(You'd need "showdead=yes" to see most of their comment history).
What is good-faith politics trolling, herr hall-monitor?
And btw, they/them/their are not my pronouns.
You should look at all of this relatively: from an absolute standpoint, humanity isn't good for the planet
CO2 levels were at least an order of magnitude higher millions of years ago. Perhaps that is better and humanity is actually improving the planet? Who is to say what is good for a planet?
Humanity may not be good for humanity.
Driving to a restaurant is, though
Practically: No. It's just not enough emissions to worry about.
The problem rather is local pollutant emission, particularly when the wood used isn't completely dry.