Currently, HN is the only place on the internet I am willing to interact with others _because_ it lacks the "social layer" you are recommending.
The focus on user comments that are thoughtful, relevant, and respectful _is_ the social connection I value.
If you want to add value and not bloody public spectacle rank comments instead of users.
I have a bunch of low quality posts here when idiots piss me off, but also share world first research and breakthroughs I've been involved with the rare time the counter party is worth talking to.
> I have a bunch of low quality posts here when idiots piss me off
It’s ironic because in the second of the parts I quoted you on here you are basically yourself generalizing the users instead of the comments.
Is it really “idiots” that piss you off (the users)? Or is it the specific things they said in isolated cases (the comments) that piss you off? Wasn’t your point exactly that this kind of distinction is important?
We're thinking we could uplevel the social layer
head => palmHN does not let you do that though. At least last time I asked about it, they sent me a response saying that they’d notify me when it became possible to delete an account. And they provided some reasons for why they don’t delete comments and accounts.
For me I would prioritize the wishes of the contributors.
Also my wish as a contributer is that the threads stay like this. So I can come back later and reread them. I often gained value in reading a linked old thread.
My advice for people not wishing for that, would be simply to stop commenting instead of demanding the site should change.
I know this means someone could still use stylometry to try to reaggregate the posts, but that's less reliable than HN actually telling us that the same authenticated user made all these posts over a decade.
-Twilight Zone Episode: Time Enough at Last-