It's much more narrow than that, if you read it.
It appears to be "knowingly make the naughty picture and also know that it's directly tied to a person and that it's naughty"
It appears to be "knowingly make the naughty picture and also know that it's directly tied to a person and that it's naughty"
I suspect the courts will find that “make a picture of Jane Smith eating dinner” should have been caught: someone asked for it by name. If you provided a sufficiently detailed description of Jane, like you would to a police artist, and the end result ends up looking like Jane although she was never mentioned, that would seem a lot trickier to pin on the AI.
Which links to the legal code which is modified here: http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:15%20section:6...
The original legal code defines "intimate visual depiction".