Now try to use data that flawed to make assumptions over a lifespan about human health. About the only studies I truly believe are the ones where people are at a facility and all food is provided to them and tracked.
We were allowed out - I had a full time job, but couldn't eat or drink any food not provided by the center (we took a radio-isotope tracer with food, and had to collect our poop). It was quite interesting :_)
I find that most of the dismissal around FFQs is pretty vague and seems to come from a group of people who find the consensus in nutrition research inconvenient for them.
The margins of error on online opt-in polls are massive.
How many Americans think chocolate milk comes from brown cows? I’d wager almost every single person who answers in the affirmative really just thinks it’s the funnier answer.
Others believe it, or at least continue to believe, because they find a community and connection with other believers.
I wish those people pushing this, were doing it just for the lulz. But mostly they are serious.
LLMs are very good at mixing information to produce bullshit.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Slate_Star_Code...