Proton Mail Adds an Open-Source AI Writing Assistant to Take on Gmail
news.itsfoss.com
news.itsfoss.com
The words privacy and ai are in my mind almost irreconcilable. I wish them all the luck in the world and hope their other customers stay happy, but it seems they will have to lose me. Which is fine. I think they do what is best for proton, it is just that proton might be no longer what is best for me.
I just keep wondering if companies know that while lacking a certain feature may cost them customers, having it may do so as well.
You can run many AI system on user machines. Some versions of stable diffusion can run on laptops. They can be run privately, even on air-gapped machines if necessary.
Can you explain why?
I know that email providers are scanning the received and send emails. But that is something both party involved know (or at least should know) beforehand. This is what I mean with implicit permission. People sending me an email can and must expect that my email provider will scan their emails to a certain degree. They can und must expect, that I will store their email on a local device for an indefinite period. But they can also expect that I will not post their emails somewhere on the web or forward it to someone else. If they desire otherwise they may state their desire and if I agree with them I will try to accommodate for that to the best of my ability.
For most cases I know about in which ai is used there is neither an implicit nor an explicit permission involved and just the assumption that the other side is ok with their data being shared with a 3rd party as long as it is with a machine which may or may not promises to run locally. Having this permission is an assumption I will not make and which I think is wrong.
Hence why in my mind privacy and ai is irreconcilable. Because the only way I can see to have them both is with an incredible unpractical overhead of managing all this implicit and explicit permissions.
Hopes this answers your question. Though I'm not trying to convince you or anyone else.
I am considering the same thing.
The government law is out of their control but not having your emails at rest unencrypted.
It is end to end encryption they don't support as this article explains. Yes, it is two very different things however just as important.
Then again, it's a WEB app!
"By default, all the processing happens locally, on the user's device, with no sensitive information being sent over to Proton, not even for training the AI models being used thanks to Proton's zero-access encryption tech."
And still, no Proton Drive for Linux.
- is opt-in. You must actively choose to use this feature
- is open-source
- uses an open-source model
- does not use your data to train the model
- doesn't break existing zero-access-encryption
- runs locally on supported devices
- can be run on a Proton-provided no-log server if you choose to
From my understanding Scribe doesn't do anything unless you enter a prompt. And before that you have still have to choose between local or server side before you can even use it.
There's also a toggle to remove it from the UI.
It's opt-in, open source, runs on device, does not use your emails to train the model, and most important of all does not grant Proton access to your emails.
What part of that do you see as a privacy violation?
Maybe that will be the new "spam box", ANOTHER inbox for AI generated emails.
I also wouldn't mind if some people got a bit of help with proofreading shit they send out.
Translation is also a nice one, if it's built in why not.