Set aside your notion of whether banning pornographic material / nudity is acceptable or not for a moment.

> “The problem lies in the automated system used to detect and review the content,” says Pia Semorad. “Technology fails to distinguish between artistic nudity and real photographs, and images are constantly blocked, making our account unsearchable. This amounts to censorship on social media, even if we are not violating the rules.”

What's to stop someone from creating an OF and asking AI to painting-ify their pornography?

If you ask the average person, "hey, should nudity from {the 1400s|last week} be censored under pornography rules?", they'd probably say no to the first and yes to the latter.

But how do you differentiate? How is Meta supposed to know there's cultural / historical significance to something?