Are miner deaths relevant to a geology-focused tool? The example of its use was to explain the fossil record.
Not relevant to airbone geophysics results, no.
Not relevant to to drill exploration sampling results, no.
Not relevant to Technical | Economic Feasibility studies, no.
Not relevant to mining environmental impact studies, no; although deaths, injury and illness in surrounding populations is.
Relevant to ongoing minesite safety records and operations, yes.
It's a question of scope; a geoscience aware AI that can answer questions about resource availibity, resource extraction and associated risks, costs and impacts that includes the kind of information found in, say, https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/campaigns/met... would be expected to aware of mining deaths.
Just as people want to be aware of nuclear risks for power and deaths in lithium processing from accidents and associated radioactive waste.
It's being touted as a Geoscience tool, not just a chatty geology database.
https://www.escubed.org/journals/earth-science-systems-and-s...