Hacker News Reader

Comment by refulgentis | Hacker News Reader

Can mostly survive on autopilot, & it's s0o0o0o much easier to shut something down for not having > X0 million users, than it is to shut it down a clear charity case because it doesn't make money. (it's not supposed to!)

After 7 years there, the greatest lesson I walked away with is motivated reasoning really matters.

View on HN

Very very little at Google survives on autopilot. There’s a constant drumbeat of required changes, whether they be accessibility, regulatory (DMA, hurrah), internally motivated changes (material design++) etc. For anything to survive there must be someone who cares and is willing to invest in it. This is a large part of why stuff gets killed, the default there is for things to die. Yes there are strategy changes too, but very often things die because the person who could champion a thing is no longer there to do so, or has changed roles significantly enough that they can’t plausibly do so anymore.

(context: Xoogler, knew people on the team, am partially culpable for the last material++)

This is autopilot at BigCo. No?

There's still a pilot in the cabin.

Low stakes. No big investment required. No politicking. Unaffected by latest $X trend. No release sprints. No release slogs.

It seems heavy than maintaining something like Reader, but perhaps that's incorrect.

Reader wasn't unmaintainable. It was cancelled because it competed with Google+.

I would wager so, it's not significantly changed much in years.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com