> Utilizing places as assets is so incredibly damaging to our society.
That only happens because the govt. in cahoots with NIMBYies restricts new development while we have a rising population.
This is simple math and economics.
there is plenty of unused housing inventory. the problem is that people can no longer afford rents.
> When are we going to address the government overregulation problem?
don't worry, the supreme court just overturned the chevron doctrine. hope you weren't for right-to-repair or net neutrality! but pesky "overregulation" right? it's all bad if it comes from "the government."
> there is plenty of unused housing inventory
False: https://www.reddit.com/r/badeconomics/comments/musne8/dispro...
What do you say about cities losing literally hundreds of millions on housing funds?
https://www.mercurynews.com/2024/04/13/audit-san-jose-failed...
> the problem is that people can no longer afford rents
And that is because supply is low. Go to the root cause of that:
https://sfstandard.com/2024/04/08/san-francisco-new-housing-...
> San Francisco approved just 7 new homes in 2 months. Why?
https://scott-wiener.medium.com/yes-supply-demand-apply-to-h...
Supply/demand is proven science in housing.
> it's all bad if it comes from "the government."
The other side of the coin is:
It's all good if it comes from "the government."!
https://southpark.cc.com/video-clips/9bipvp/south-park-the-g...
You should also read up on the case where the Chevron deference happened in the first place.
Feel free to add just one of the "8 billion official and academic resources" that you and OP ignored.
If you say supply and demand doesn't work for housing (science proven over centuries in human societies all over the world), you are similar to vaccine deniers.
We’re following along with the pseudoscience and propaganda of the prior generation of post war shellshocked Cold War paranoids
Supply demand has more to do with real supply. Even if there’s plenty of housing in BFE no one wants to live there. Where the supply is and other variables matter. Cherry picked social media and corporate news may as well be throwing spaghetti at the wall. This is the colloquial equivalent to p-hacking.
How the species tries to blow itself up.
If we were meant to exist forever all these physics things would not be able to harm us. Constrain us to life on Earth. We couldn’t die.
Entropy is a bitch.
Using that logic, thanks for agreeing with me!
My point is the endless possibilities and only one real reality matters; enough people feel served by society or they’ll forget the words and reach for guns.
Your grasp of contemporary memes is not armor against physics.
By all available evidence we have the opposite problem.
Your take is still filled with euphemism for such things
simple transportation and ecology