One example: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-teen-gravely-injured-by-h...
1. We strengthen the pressure vessel enough so that it gives way at higher pressure, making a "stronger bomb"
2. We strengthen the pressure vessel enough so that it doesn't give way, making it not a bomb at all.
It's not at all clear if the duct tape will do 1 or 2 or something else, and this first-order logic / first-impressions design doesn't smell to me like a rigorous solution.
I thought, for safety reasons, it was worth replying to the comment suggesting to wrap "a ton of" tape around it. At the time I replied there were no other replies.
Not trying to win a debate with you. Just trying to share that it could be a bad idea. Rather than just assuming that making the shards less sharp or fragmented was the only possible outcome.
You're replying reasonably and I'm dragging that into my top-level comment about rigor. Impedance mismatch.
This is something I would suggest buyers do at every store they shop at.