If it says it on the label, and you're allergic to it, then you shouldn't eat it. This doesn't harm consumers at all.
The business discloses, what was added as ingredients, and what contamination is possible. (Because production line is shard or similar)
What more do you want?
I guess results of regular random testing could be put online.
Forbid using same knife to slice different things is another thing to be done.
That the labeling disambiguate "made in a factory that makes sesame products" and "actually contains sesame." What we now have with "may contain" could be either and everyone is worse off
It's almost like if you want a different outcome, the government agencies involved need to step up and do a more thoughtful job of architecting these policies in a way where the companies are forced to follow the "spirit" of them.
I can't be mad if I create a policy, and someone follows it. My intention should have been in the policy, not just implied.
The common denominator here is that the government gives companies new rules
to follow, and enforces severe penalties for breaking them, and so the
companies minimized their risk by following them to the extreme.
architecting these policies in a way where the companies are forced to
follow the "spirit" of them.
I can't be mad if I create a policy, and someone follows it.
Hardly the worst kind of teeth.