No one has said or claimed that... and it isn't about "my" preference or yours; it's about the scientific approach to resolving an issue by addressing its root cause, or at least adhering to the 80/20 rule.
The issue here is exploitation. All I see is a greedy company trying to profit from a demographic instead of resolving the root cause, offering a "subscription-based" medicine. It's strange how all these new "breakthrough" medicines are supposed to be taken for life, like Ozempic. Meanwhile, the best prevention is to get tested in advance. It takes a few minutes and it's reliable, safe, and obviously cheaper than paying for pills/shots for life for the chance of getting that disease/virus.
If that medicine were a "treatment," on the other hand, then it would definitely be a breakthrough, especially if it's taken once, like some treatments for other STDs. Obviously, it isn't, and there's an entire business model built around that.