People won't work on Google products for free.
This is one of the many reasons I'm for a UBI, it makes it easier to do art without having to be a "starving artist".
People won't work on Google products for free.
This is one of the many reasons I'm for a UBI, it makes it easier to do art without having to be a "starving artist".
I haven't made up my mind about UBI, and I do think that it would be valuable to society for all persons to have room to experiment and innovate around ideas (effectively, enable society wide R&D), but I think it's an open question as to whether it is worth the costs.
I already struggle to hire anybody help with fixing the many problems with my house, and it's very inefficient for me to need to learn to become an expert in so many different fields. I quite enjoy it, and there are positive externalities, but having specialists (or just "willing hands") in areas that there is demand for is also quite important to a functioning society.
The last era where we had this kind of society, was probably the 70s and we are still recycling the cultural artefacts of that time.
But I happily DJ on Saturday in a local club from 10PM to 4AM, help with carrying beer cases, setting up cables and equipment, for free.
What if it all comes down to supply and demand? Maybe the supply of artists is much greater than the demand for art, while for tech products it is reversed?
Fortunately all of us temporarily embarrassed billionaires have a fallback plan. Just a few years ago, in my late twenties I was seriously trying to apply to YC, with the dreams of getting some funding .
Now that I'm a bit older and more discouraged, I've made peace of being a worker bee until I retire. I'm still hoping to get a role with an equity package that allows me to retire sooner rather than later.