This makes me wonder if it's possible to create a real-life simulation video game where you can study the economic effects of policies and make better decisions in real life.
you would literally be trying to model every individual's decisions.
here's simple test: try to predict the stock market -- this is essentially what you are asking (the stock markets can be rigged and it wouldn't matter for this test to be useful because that is actually part of the prediction).
nobody even comes close.
Agreed, such simulations can not be used to answer specific questions. Same thing also goes for weather / climate models, not just human economy.
> try to predict the stock market -- this is essentially what you are asking
No, it is not what they are asking. Mistake here is confusing what is called microstate and macrostate [0] in statistical mechanics.
E.g. yes you can not predict the path an individual gas molecule will take around a driving vehicle because it is a highly chaotic system [1]. And the same goes for individual stocks at a specific time. However, that does not mean that air flow simulations are not possible or useless, quite the opposite.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microstate_(statistical_mechan... [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory
This is a very classical approach. The idea that macro economy follows different models than the micro is somewhat modern. For example this caused a huge crisis in Keynesian economics in the 1970s where inflation models and the Phillips curve were drastically different than predictions and was a factor in the development of New Keynesian theories.
The examples you give aren't about individual micro prediction not agreeing with the macro, but that's the case you can come across in various economic theories where is there is a literal disconnect the two and correct micro equations disagree with the macro equations.
The reason why I think having virtual agents instead of real players is important is because real players are not invested enough. They can always switch to a different reality whereas virtual agents are stuck and have to live with the consequences of their actions. That does change the dynamics a lot.
i think every engineer wishes they could distill the human condition into a series of lines of code
as a human, i should hope it can't
Maybe it simulates 2% of reality but the programmers (being natural reductionists) think that it is 80%. Now the the decision makers can wreck havoc with the pseudo-learnings from the simulation.
Obvious evidence of this can be seen by the Fed actions the past few years and the disastrous consequences. Some of the smartest economists in the world work for the Fed and still made huge errors.
Unfortunately I have neither the skill or dedication to carry out such an immense task.
We are social animals, taking us out of an environment where we're part of and accountable to a community is our true nature is like taking a fish out of water to study its true behavior
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulacron-3 [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_on_a_Wire