That's not fixing the problem. That's embracing it, and also giving a greenlight to all the other prospective AI data abusers watching the case.
If you want to fix it, rip this company apart. Investors (who should've known what was happening) get zero. Data gets clawed back. Etc.
Why would plaintiffs settle with an attaboy for the abusers like this?
> The plaintiffs’ lawyers would also be paid from the eventual sale or cash-out; they said they would ask for no more than 39 percent of the amount received by the class. (Thirty-nine percent of $52 million would be about $20 million.)
Are big class action suits like this ever done in the public interest?
Like, as pro bono work by lawyers who are already wealthy, and their only goal is to do what's good for society?