Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by romanhn | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

romanhn·

At 10 employees the company is still incredibly risky. With this scheme you'll never grow past that size.

View on HN

Well, the alternative (which appears to be the status quo) is to give lower % equity to the first ~50 employees.

What do you think is the ideal breakdown of equity for early employees?

people already do a variant of “earlier gets more, later gets less” that’s a lot smoother/linear than your scheme and can be customized and adjusted to roles (engineers get more than salespeople as an example). With what you describe, offering some exec down the line 0.5% or whatever is impossible.

You need flexibility because at any moment some killer candidate might come along that you need to juice the grant for. Just being earlier doesn’t mean they contribute more to the company

> Just being earlier doesn’t mean they contribute more to the company

No, but being earlier does mean taking on more risk, which is the whole argument founders and seed investors make for their cuts.

But you can leave easily. and in 2024 I think people should insist on getting a decent salary (FAANG is impossible, but for most of the country, “even just” $170K is eye watering), and work life balance (sure, you will have to put in extra hours sometimes, but if it’s a 12 hours a day shop, don’t join). Founder should work a lot more aggressively, live a lot more spartan, and obviously is shackled to the damn thing with no optionality.

That makes sense, thanks

Reply on news.ycombinator.com