If it wasn't for non-technical editors requiring an interactive WYSIWYG backend, it could've been made with a static site generator, but as it is, Django needs a couple dozen megabytes of RAM at worst for logged in users.
As a first approximation I grepped for PATCH in the web server logs and it seems to service about 30 of those per second on a $40/month vps. I haven't load tested it so not sure how high it could go. That's not including any POSTs etc which may also generate DB writes.
Bear in mind this isn't particularly performance tuned either as the webserver uses go (slow in general) and the portable go sqlite3 driver (also slow)
Go isn't slow in general, it's pretty damn fast without getting into the crazy handcraft artisanal stuff with e.g. C/C++. It's, IMO, the perfect balance between speed, features, language complexity, standard library richness.
For reference, a random benchmark that shows that even the optimised to hell Twister Python web server is slower than the out of the box, in the standard library, `net/http` in Go.