That's not at all the reputation they have. They've been acting as an extension of the copyright lobby for years:
• https://torrentfreak.com/new-uk-police-unit-announces-two-ar...
• https://www.vice.com/en/article/bvn4nw/cops-arrest-3-people-...
• https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/...
There are probably hundreds of instances of them doing stuff like the above, that was just the results from a quick search.
Moreover, the council is also the police authority, which could explain a more active copyright infringement force.
Generally a "police force for hire" is more associated with corruption, or were you not picking up on that?
This almost certainly comes from long experience investigating fraud and other financial crimes amongst the businesses and people based there, to a degree and level of complexity not found in other regions of the UK.
For instance they host Action Fraud for the entire country.
If you want to talk about enforcement priorities, contact your PCC, or better yet, right now, your local candidates.
In that piece Monbiot tries to blame the Corporation for the 2008 crash, which is laughable.
The City is not an autonomous enclave free from Parliamentary control.
The Corporation is some kind of acquisitive out-of-democratic-control alien dropped into the middle of London finance. OTOH the City is just another rich men's club I guess. Nice that its democracy for company-entities.
What makes them different?
IE, if I get robbed in the City of London is it even worth calling the police?
I’ve also heard that their average level of policeman is more educated , ie many holding degrees, masters etc. I presume this must be due to the nature of the work they’re most known for ie combatting complex fraud, organised crime etc
For reference, the Met has 33k officers for 10m people
Whilst there are only 8,600 residents, there are apparently over 600,000 commuters working there every day.
https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/about-us/about-the-city-of-l...