Wake me up when they go to D.C. and start working for the people at government wages. This isn’t part of OpenAI’s marketing, but it’s still self-aggrandizement.
No, he hasn’t. He started a non-profit. I can’t find his pay.
Also, the Wikipedia seems wrong. The Alignment Research Center is not a 501(c)(3) charity [1], they simply accept donations through one [2]. They directly claim their evaluations team, METR, is a 501(c)(3) [3], but due to the name being so close to “metro,” I’m having trouble verifying that. (They also launder at least smaller donations through the middleman charity [4].)
The closest Cristiano has come to public service is his role at the NIST, an appointment which prompted a revolt amongst staffers given his ties to effective altruism [[5].
All a bit ironic for a pair of nonprofits preaching transparency.
[1] https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/
[2] https://www.every.org/alignment?donateTo=alignment#/donate/c...
[3] https://www.alignment.org/donate/
[5] https://web.archive.org/web/20240607060738/https://venturebe... having trouble loading the original Venture Beat article
https://www.nist.gov/people/paul-christiano
The Alignment Research Center is, in fact, a 501(c)3 charity, here is their Form 990:
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/863...
METR is also a 501(c)3. It doesn't have a Form 990 because it's so new it hasn't filed a return yet, but here is the Guidestar page:
https://www.guidestar.org/Profile/99-1219864
every.org is just a generic non-profit payment processor. Lots of people use payment processors, because managing payments is annoying. Calling this "laundering" is like saying that accepting third-party payments through Stripe is some sort of illegal sinister plot.
It is. I’m saying the sole evidence of outcome I could find was his staff revolting.
> Alignment Research Center is, in fact, a 501(c)3 charity, here is their Form 990
Thank you, I stand corrected. (Christiano’s compensation is an admirable zero.)
> every.org is just a generic non-profit payment processor
Sure, and given ARC and METR are 501(c)(3)s, it’s fine. Charity to charity. If either weren’t, and were simply non-profits, it would mean a charity was lending its tax-exempt status to a non-charity. That would be sketchy. But as you’ve shown, it’s not what’s going on here.