Yes, the Murdoch media is vile, but this goes for all of the British papers. The Daily Mail is a wretched place to work but is also the most well respected in the UK in terms of the training they give. That should tell you everything.
Probably most of the tabloids though.
The Guardian, The Observer, the FT, the Independent, and some of the significant regionals (Manchester Evening News, Brighton Argus, Oxford Mail, the Scotsman, the Belfast Telegraph etc.) have much better reputations.
I doubt there is a news publication in the world that has escaped having a toxic newsroom at least at some point.
But we're talking about the most fundamental questions of journalistic ethics here.
The Murdoch media -- in particular the News Of The World -- hacked people's phones (including a missing teenager's phone, deleting voicemails and giving her family and the police false evidence she was alive), spied on people, and colluded with a series of corrupt police. And on really an epic scale.
The News Of The World was little more than a criminal enterprise, and essentially everyone in News International leadership knew it.
Even the (utterly loathsome, morally corrosive) Daily Mail is a beacon of truth by comparison.