If you get used to the need to occasionally take a short-term hit for a long-term win, it gets easier over time. It's a good thing to practice, in all senses of the term.
If everyone actually did switch, the options would become better through the increased resources the alternatives would get.
Not to mention it's often simply not a choice at all, because you have to collaborate with people who only work in those file formats.
Everything I normally use on Windows can be replaced with the exception of Adobe, and it massively affects any ability to be creative or use something like Ubuntu as a daily driver
Photoshop - Affinity Photo / Krita
Premiere - Davinci Resolve
Source: Have worked professionally with both Affinity and Resolve.
after effects is probably more difficult to get away from though.
1. Alice signs the ToS, granted Adobe a non-exclusive license to all work created using Adobe products.
2. Disney (or insert your own litigious company here) hires Alice to do some art. Alice and Disney sign a contract that says Disney owns the IP to the art outright and Alice retains no rights to the work.
3. Alice makes the art. Alice gives the Art to Disney. Disney pays Alice.
4. Adobe thinks the art is great, and puts the art on stock.adobe.com, using the license that Alice granted them.
5. Chuck's Ads hires Bob to do some art; they sign a contract that allows Bob to use stock art for some of the elements.
6. Bob makes the art using stock art; specifically using Alice's art which Adobe has put on stock.adobe.com.
7. Bob sells the art to Chuck's Ads. Chuck's Ads runs the ad nationwide. The company who is making the advertised product likes the art and puts it on the box which is sold in stores.
8. Disney's flesh eating lawyers see the ad and start suing everybody.
What happens to Alice? From where I sit, it seems like she gets hit by a breach of contract; she granted Adobe a license which she didn't have the right to grant.
What happens to Bob? Certainly Chuck's Ads will get sued to Disney, and they won't be happy about it. It stands to reason that Chuck's Ads and/or Disney will sue Bob for breach of contract and/or copyright infringement respectively.
You're correct. I'm not saying you're wrong. It is naive to assume people can just "Cancel Adobe." But it's also naive to assume people who get paid to use this product suite don't legally have to.
Also I have 14 years of prior projects that I sometimes need to reopen, so canceling just isn't an option.
But what were you supposed to do right? Use some software with the eraser in a weird place??
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40607704
It seems to me not worth the tradeoff.
Since I can create the same titles/animations in Apple Motion in a fraction of the time that they take to create in AE, I use that for all newer projects.
but also by today there are a lot of good alternatives many more and much more mature ones then in the past
I try all the alternatives annually and nothing has as comprehensive and complete a toolset.
I’ve chosen it over AE for all the animated titles I’ve worked on for the past 8 or so years and have had no issues.
Opening AE to update old projects is a chore, never enjoyable. Motion is actually fun to use. I paid once, and they’ve been updating it for free since 2011.
Send me a guide for the latest versions of creative cloud working with wine please. It'd be great to be proven wrong and gain 100% usefulness in Linux land :)
The way you're interpreting things must mean you think all software is compatible with every operating system
Reread my messages please :)