It wasn't like today where you have to be a perfect cinnamon roll of a candidate who ticks all of HR's required-skill checkboxes before you can move on to the grueling 5-6 rounds of interviews.
It wasn't like today where you have to be a perfect cinnamon roll of a candidate who ticks all of HR's required-skill checkboxes before you can move on to the grueling 5-6 rounds of interviews.
And dear reader, if this has you thinking that the early internet was a planet-wide bird's nest of bailing wire and duct-tape slapped together by amateurs, you're paying attention. Huge parts of it were just that. We're all better at it now, but "better" is a relative term and not evenly distributed.
"Entry level" doesn't even mean the same thing nowadays and it's a crying shame.
I remember one of my interviews that went well in the end. In the middle of the interview, they mentioned using Java and building web apps. At the time, I was a C++ developer with no web development experience.
I said: "I never did web development," and their response was, "You do know how to write source code, don't you?"
I said: "Of course I do, but..."
They cut me off with: "You will pick it up, don't worry about it."
Also, how right were they?
Better to laugh about it than cry about it, eh :].
"You know how to write source code, don't you?"
Answer: "yes, but I mostly prefer to write fully compiled code directly to disk. Much more efficient".
HR does that so they can empire build. If it takes 200 hours of HR work to hire someone instead of 20, then the director of HR has 10x the staff and can command higher prices.
He knew I was doing computing at uni and that seemed to be enough.