There's also AI's dark secret coming out -> it's very expensive to run.
But it's still WAY cheaper than upper management salaries, so, to employ classic MBA logic, they are the optimal staff to replace so as to maximize cost savings.
But it's still WAY cheaper than upper management salaries, so, to employ classic MBA logic, they are the optimal staff to replace so as to maximize cost savings.
You can easily spend at least as much on AI per month as on a C-level officer.
We'll have to start by replacing the CEOs and work our way down as AI costs drop?
The people making these decisions are not gonna cut their own jobs first, even if that made the most sense.
Step 2: the CEO sells out the rest of the C-Suite for an even bigger year end bonus.
Step 3: the shareholders replace the CEO, promoting one of his now AI automated fellow C-suite, to maximize shareholder profit.
It's corporate hunger games ... just without winners.
Isn't that why was it so important that Altman purge the OpenAI board?
Or can shareholders bypass the board?
OpenAI doesn't answer to shareholders since it is a non-profit.
> Or can shareholders bypass the board?
Shareholders can replace the board with a AI friendly board. If such boards are popular they wont be hard to find, and then board members would rather replace the CEO than get replaced themselves.