Nameplate of the Susquehanna generator is ~2.6GW. As long as that much new firm renewables capacity comes online in the next 20 years close enough to get power to the facility with transmission, this is not a terrible problem to solve.

https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/images/figure_6_01_c... (yellow is new solar going in over the next 12 months; refer to proximity of large out of state installations to this generator)

https://www.gem.wiki/Susquehanna_nuclear_power_plant

> According to data from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory compiled by the Environment America Research & Policy Center, Pennsylvania has enough solar potential today to meet the state's electric demand in 2020 by almost fivefold.

https://www.delcotimes.com/2023/11/09/guest-column-pa-is-los...

In short, this is a reasonable solution today (colo'ing datacenter load near this low carbon generator) and can be solved for in the future. It's actually very good imho that folks today are taking into account carbon emissions when citing this type of load/demand, versus just dropping datacenters anywhere (looking at you Missouri!).

https://cowboystatedaily.com/2024/05/22/huge-1-2-million-pan...

> The largest solar power project in Wyoming, which plans to supply electricity to a burgeoning infrastructure of power-hungry data centers in south Cheyenne, was given the green light for construction Tuesday by a key state permitting agency.