You are not allowed to reproduce Mistral's works (beyond the usual Fair Use allowances).
Nor is Mistral entitled to reproduce your works (unless you have licensed as such).
If it does, you can sue for copyright infringement.
The point is: nobody knows and the AI companies are getting well ahead of the law.
But what part about what I said do you believe to be undecided?
That a human can learn without violating copyright? That a machine can learn without violating copyright?
Perhaps if all rules were written in stone, and clear of ambiguity, we would not need judges or the legal process. But that’s not how any of this works.
There is some overlap, but if you think you've found some undiscovered loophole in centuries of copyright law, you're mistaken.