The actual reality, though, is that the future is comprised of people that don’t engage with these kinds of reproductive-limiting technologies and worldviews. So in an ironic sense, it almost doesn’t matter - evolution will march on and doesn’t have much use for ideologies. It’s a sort of filter for the future, not an abstract evaluation of freedom and rights.
Not saying it will, but I want to point out the flaws in your logic.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-03-12/the-ri...
I downvoted him because what he said doesn't make sense. Namely, his argument that rich people can't afford costs of living. That is straight up hypocrisy.
Otherwise I agree that richer people have less children. Money is a problem factor, but it's not because someone doesn't have enough of it.
>They are caused by economic issues. Wealthier populations typically have fewer offspring. The negative trends in places like Japan (and presumably Korea) are caused by the high cost of living, the lack of support for parents (lacking or overly expensive childcare etc).
Money.